• CONTACT
  • LAST ISSUE
  • IN PROGRESS
  • EARLY VIEW
  • ACCEPTED PAPERS
GET_pdf delibra

Volume 17 (1-2) 2011, 53-62

Computational Experiments for Scheduling Workflow Applications in Grid Environment

Mika Marek 1, Piątek Wojciech 2, Waligóra Grzegorz 1, Węglarz Jan 1,2

1Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology,
Piotrowo 2, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
e-mail: {marek.mika/grzegorz.waligora/jan.weglarz}@cs.put.poznan.pl
2Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center,
Noskowskiego 12/4, 61-704 Poznań, Poland
e-mail: piatek@man.poznan.pl

Received:

Received: 17 November 2011; accepted: 5 December 2011; on-line: 23 December 2011

DOI:   10.12921/cmst.2011.17.01.53-62

OAI:   oai:lib.psnc.pl:739

Abstract:

The problem of scheduling workflow applications in a grid environment is considered. The problem is divided into two stages: (i) resource allocation, which consists in allocating distributed grid resources to tasks of a workflow in such a way that the resource demands of each task are satisfied, and (ii) scheduling performed by local grid schedulers. Grid resources are divided into computational and network resources. Computational and transmission workflow tasks are distinguished. A computational experiment is presented in order to show the importance of resource allocation, as well as examine the influence of the local scheduling policy. Certain conclusions and directions for future research are given.

Key words:

grid, resource allocation, scheduling, workflow

References:

[1] S. Bąk, M. Krystek, K. Kurowski, A. Oleksiak, W. Piątek, J. Węglarz, GSSIM – a Tool for Distributed Computing Experiments. Scientific Programming 19(4), 231-251 (2011).
[2] E. Deelman, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, K. Blackburn, A. Lazzarini, A. Arbree, R. Cavanaugh, S. Korranda, Mapping abstract complex workflows onto Grid environments. Journal of Grid Computing 1(1), 25-39 (2003)
[3] I. Foster, C. Kesselman, Computational Grids, in: I. Foster and C. Kesselman (eds.) The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 15-52 (1999).
[4] K. Kurowski, J. Nabrzyski, A. Oleksiak, J. Węglarz, GSSIM – Grid Scheduling Simulator. Computational Methods in Science and Technology 13(2), 121-129 (2007).
[5] K. Kurowski, J. Nabrzyski, A. Oleksiak, J. Węglarz, Multicriteria approach to two-level hierarchy scheduling in Grids. Journal of Scheduling 11(5), 371-379 (2008).
[6] M. Mika, G. Waligóra, J. Węglarz, Modelling and solving grid-resource allocation problem with network resources for workflow applications. Journal of Scheduling 14(3), 291-306 (2011).
[7] http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/
[8] http://www.platform.com/
[9] http://www.pbsgridworks.com/
[10] http://gridengine.sunsource.net/
[11] http://www.eu-egee.org/
[12] http://clusterix.pcz.pl/
[13] http://www.coregrid.net/
[14] http://www.gssim.org

  • JOURNAL MENU

    • AIMS AND SCOPE
    • EDITORS
    • EDITORIAL BOARD
    • NOTES FOR AUTHORS
    • CONTACT
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2015
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2016
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2017
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2018
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2019
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2020
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2021
    • IAN SNOOK PRIZES 2024
  • GALLERY

  • LAST ISSUE

  • MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION

    • SUBMIT A MANUSCRIPT
  • FUTURE ISSUES

    • ACCEPTED PAPERS
    • EARLY VIEW
    • Volume 31 (1) – in progress
  • ALL ISSUES

    • 2024
      • Volume 30 (3–4)
      • Volume 30 (1–2)
    • 2023
      • Volume 29 (1–4)
    • 2022
      • Volume 28 (4)
      • Volume 28 (3)
      • Volume 28 (2)
      • Volume 28 (1)
    • 2021
      • Volume 27 (4)
      • Volume 27 (3)
      • Volume 27 (2)
      • Volume 27 (1)
    • 2020
      • Volume 26 (4)
      • Volume 26 (3)
      • Volume 26 (2)
      • Volume 26 (1)
    • 2019
      • Volume 25 (4)
      • Volume 25 (3)
      • Volume 25 (2)
      • Volume 25 (1)
    • 2018
      • Volume 24 (4)
      • Volume 24 (3)
      • Volume 24 (2)
      • Volume 24 (1)
    • 2017
      • Volume 23 (4)
      • Volume 23 (3)
      • Volume 23 (2)
      • Volume 23 (1)
    • 2016
      • Volume 22 (4)
      • Volume 22 (3)
      • Volume 22 (2)
      • Volume 22 (1)
    • 2015
      • Volume 21 (4)
      • Volume 21 (3)
      • Volume 21 (2)
      • Volume 21 (1)
    • 2014
      • Volume 20 (4)
      • Volume 20 (3)
      • Volume 20 (2)
      • Volume 20 (1)
    • 2013
      • Volume 19 (4)
      • Volume 19 (3)
      • Volume 19 (2)
      • Volume 19 (1)
    • 2012
      • Volume 18 (2)
      • Volume 18 (1)
    • 2011
      • Volume 17 (1-2)
    • 2010
      • Volume SI (2)
      • Volume SI (1)
      • Volume 16 (2)
      • Volume 16 (1)
    • 2009
      • Volume 15 (2)
      • Volume 15 (1)
    • 2008
      • Volume 14 (2)
      • Volume 14 (1)
    • 2007
      • Volume 13 (2)
      • Volume 13 (1)
    • 2006
      • Volume SI (1)
      • Volume 12 (2)
      • Volume 12 (1)
    • 2005
      • Volume 11 (2)
      • Volume 11 (1)
    • 2004
      • Volume 10 (2)
      • Volume 10 (1)
    • 2003
      • Volume 9 (1)
    • 2002
      • Volume 8 (2)
      • Volume 8 (1)
    • 2001
      • Volume 7 (2)
      • Volume 7 (1)
    • 2000
      • Volume 6 (1)
    • 1999
      • Volume 5 (1)
    • 1998
      • Volume 4 (1)
    • 1997
      • Volume 3 (1)
    • 1996
      • Volume 2 (1)
      • Volume 1 (1)
  • DATABASES

    • AUTHORS BASE
  • CONTACT
  • LAST ISSUE
  • IN PROGRESS
  • EARLY VIEW
  • ACCEPTED PAPERS

© 2025 CMST